Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 103% (1880MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700 +357%
8.663 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1880 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
120.3 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
270.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.33 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.663 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
541.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
205W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Navi 10
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy