Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2 +202%
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Apr 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Vesuvius
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy