Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs ATI FireGL V8600

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265X OEM +438%
2.368 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
74.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.368 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
159W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
R600
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy