Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs NVIDIA T1000

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs NVIDIA T1000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1395MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265X OEM
2.368 TFLOPS
T1000 +5%
2.5 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1280
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
74.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
2.368 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
TU117
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy