Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM +29%
0.806 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
480
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Turks
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy