Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI Radeon X1650

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
RV516
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy