AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 85W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360 896SP
+1163%
1.971 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520
0.156 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Apr 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
896
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
85W
TDP
29W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
GF119
Tobago XT
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
