Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP and 24GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 355W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock3300MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
5248 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360 896SP
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XTX +4014%
81.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3300 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
96
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
6144
56
TMUs
384
16
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
633.6 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1267 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
162.2 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.10 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
355W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Navi 31
Tobago XT
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XTX+
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy