AMD Radeon R7 360 vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (1750MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1.613 TFLOPS
Arc A310
+66%
2.688 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R7 360
1371
Arc A310
+123%
3061
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon R7 360
517
Arc A310
+189%
1496
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Oct 2022
Pirate Islands
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
DG2-128
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
