Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 360 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

AMD Radeon R7 360 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1050MHz vs 925MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1.613 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +17%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Feb 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy