Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs AMD Radeon E9172 MXM

AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs AMD Radeon E9172 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 and 2GB VRAM Radeon E9172 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9172 MXM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1219MHz vs 825MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS
Radeon E9172 MXM +97%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Oct 2017
All-In-One
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

725 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
825 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
8
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
Lexa
Opal XT
GPU Variant
E9170
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy