AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M260 and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 71% (1680MHz vs 980MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M260
0.752 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+4247%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
Gem System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
940 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
384
Shading Units
9728
24
TMUs
304
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
23.52 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
752.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
47.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
120W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Topaz
GPU Name
AD103
Topaz XT
(216-0858020)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
