AMD Radeon R7 M360 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M360 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1455MHz vs 1125MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M360
0.864 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+934%
8.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Gem System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1100 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
27.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
864.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
864.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
54.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Meso
GPU Name
AD107
Meso XT
(216-0864018)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
