Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R9 260 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 260 OEM +4280%
1.971 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

85W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
G96C
Bonaire XT (215-0839039)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy