Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Apr 2006
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
NV43
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
110 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy