AMD Radeon R9 270 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 270 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270
2.368 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+349%
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
74.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
2.368 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Curacao
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Curacao PRO
(215-0848000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
212 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
