Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 231.9GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (1695MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe +29%
4.339 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
1792
Shading Units
1280
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GA107
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
Unknown
352 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy