Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +178%
3.344 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700 Duo
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
800
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
151W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV770
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy