Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 330 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +1293%
3.344 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 330 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Feb 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
1792
Shading Units
96
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G92
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy