Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Apr 2004
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
NV41
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy