Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon R7 360E

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon R7 360E

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360E 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +107%
3.344 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360E
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Dec 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tobago
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy