Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI Radeon HD 3750

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI Radeon HD 3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 22.18GB/s)
1928 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +2044%
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3750
0.191 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
693 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.18GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
120
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.184 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.368 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
191.0 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV635
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
RV635 PRO (215-0682008)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy