AMD Radeon R9 280X vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 250W)
Score
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
2
32
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
15W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
VSA-101
Tahiti XTL
(215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Daytona
(355-0025-221)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
180 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
-
