Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD FirePro W5100

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD FirePro W5100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W5100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W5100 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +186%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro W5100
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
50W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Bonaire
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy