Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +10402%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2048
Shading Units
16
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
40W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT218
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy