Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 132% (2320MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +335%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
2075 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
3840
128
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
250W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 21
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy