Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 375W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
143 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.288GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
2
32
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
286.0 MPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
286.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
15W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
VSA-101
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
180 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy