Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (190W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210 +257%
11.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jan 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
555 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
5120
112
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GV100
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy