Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FirePro W7100

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FirePro W7100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro W7100
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
28
1792
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Tonga
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy