Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +1956%
3.29 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jan 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
1792
Shading Units
64
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
G92
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy