Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285X vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

AMD Radeon R9 285X vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285X
4.104 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano +208%
12.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1247 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
128.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.104 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
175W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Vega 10
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy