Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290
4.849 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT +7%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Oct 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
1408
160
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 14
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy