Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (85W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +249%
5.632 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
May 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
85W
950 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Tobago
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy