AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD FirePro S10000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S10000 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
Lower TDP (375W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+68%
5.733 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000
3.405 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Nov 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1792
176
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
375W
900 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Tahiti
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Zaphod
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
