Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.1GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (120W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +14%
5.733 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Mar 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.1GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
2816
Shading Units
1408
176
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
120W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
TU116
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy