Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 216.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5.733 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +135%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
96bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
2816
Shading Units
2560
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
AD107
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy