Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +179%
5.733 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Jul 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1024
176
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
438 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net