AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+600%
5.733 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350
0.819 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jul 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
512
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
819.2 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
55W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO MOCHA
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
