AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+129%
5.733 TFLOPS
T1000
2.5 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
May 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2816
Shading Units
896
176
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
50W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
TU117
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.8
