Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (85W vs 265W)
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1.613 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2 +104%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2016
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
265W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Tonga
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
5 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy