Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (85W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1.613 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +214%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy