Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM +527%
1.613 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2010
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
768
Shading Units
96
48
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

85W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
GT215
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
GT215-301-A3
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy