Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM +1450%
1.613 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6250
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
80
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

85W
TDP
19W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Cedar
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy