Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380X vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD Radeon R9 380X vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380X and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 380X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (182.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1648 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 380X +664%
3.973 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
182.4GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
5
2048
Shading Units
400
128
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
124.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
3.973 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.973 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
248.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
Redwood
Antigua XT (215-0877016)
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
43W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy