Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380X vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Radeon R9 380X vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380X and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 380X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (182.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 380X +547%
3.973 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
May 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
182.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
124.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
3.973 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.973 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
248.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
Cayman
Antigua XT (215-0877016)
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy