Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 390 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

AMD Radeon R9 390 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 390 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (275W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 390 +50%
5.12 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Mar 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
1792
160
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
160.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.120 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
375W
600 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Grenada
GPU Name
Tahiti
Grenada PRO (215-0880030)
GPU Variant
Orthrus
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy