Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 390X vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R9 390X vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390X and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 390X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 390X +18381%
5.914 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
40
176
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
184.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.914 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
739.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Grenada
GPU Name
RV620
Grenada XT (215-0880004)
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy