AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 A375 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 A375 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 66% (1531MHz vs 925MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 A375
+65%
1.299 TFLOPS
GeForce MX230
0.784 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2015
Release Date
Feb 2019
All-In-One
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1519 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
640
Shading Units
256
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.50 GPixel/s
40.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.50 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.25 GFLOPS
1299 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
783.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
24.50 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Venus
GPU Name
GP108
Venus XTX
(216-0846033)
GPU Variant
N17S-G0-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4
