Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 275W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Jan 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
64MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV380
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy