Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3104 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY +833%
7.168 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Nov 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
480
224
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Turks
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy